Friday, October 21, 2011

Week 3- Action Planning Template

Action Planning Template
Goal: To determine what kind of effect the Sheltered Instruction (inclusion) model has on language development for students previously served by English as a Second Language pull-out program.
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Resources
Evaluation
Meet with site supervisor to get a list of LEP students and determine cohort of students to research.

C. Teichman, D. Tackett, K. Cox
November 2011
PEIMS list with identified LEP students served by ESL inclusion.
List of complete cohort to research.
Collect class schedules for cohort and determine which teacher(s) provides the language support or ESL services.

C. Teichman, D. Tackett, K. Cox
November 2011
Class schedules from PEIMS system
Class schedules for cohort.
Gather data on cohort for the last 3 school years.

C. Teichman
December 2011-January 2012
DMAC- TELPAS, TAKS, any other state assessment data, or benchmarking data
DMAC reports for TAKS, TELPAS, or Benchmarks and summarize in template.
Survey teachers on factors that can impact second language acquisition.

C. Teichman
December 2011
Surveymonkey and teacher email addresses.
Survey results summary.
Review teacher certification, training, professional development, number of years of working with ESL/LEP students.
C. Teichman, D. Tackett, K. Cox, B. Seigler
January 2012  
Avatar System at Region 9 and Certificates
Summary of trainings/ professional development.
Collect new state assessment data and final benchmarks for the end of school year.
C. Teichman
June 2012
DMAC- TELPAS and local benchmarks.
Add results to template.
Present data to site administrators, teachers, and District Improvement Team.
C. Teichman
Summer 2012
District Administrators, teachers involved in study, and District Improvement Team.
Presentation of data to assist in district and campus improvement plans.





3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am wondering if you have an opinion on your question before you begin collecting data. This is another one of those topics that tends to have strong opinions on both sides. Data to support, or change, an opinion will be great. I have a sister that serves the ESL students in a high school setting. She will be very interested in your results.

cteichman said...

The ESL pull-out model is thought to be the most expensive, least effective model. However, I think inclusion will only prove to be beneficial if teachers are doing the right things with the kids. If the case is they are not, then I believe that a school would be better off with a pull-out model if all teachers are not getting on board with working with ELLs. I am very interested in what in what it will show.

M.Rod's Blog said...

You're action research plan looks very good! It is clear to see what your goal is and how you plan to reach that goal. I beleive you have a good topic as well that can produce valuable information to many educators. Best of luck!